  Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences  
 
Author  Message 

nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:01 pm  
 Some of the sequences listed in Encyclopedia have explanations in terms of species identities. I think it could be useful to list some identities. Caution, a sequence does not uniquely define a combinatorial species. ======= A001787Number of edges in ndimensional hypercube. X . ENS . ENSI fix a vertex, and a choose one of n adjacent edges. (here comes X) Once edge is fixed, the adjacent faces, cubes, and so on are also fixed. By cutting the nhypercube with a median hyperplane of my initial edge I got a (n1) hypercube whose vertices lays onetoone in the middles of the parallel edges of my initial edge. So each subset of the (n1) remaining directions define uniquely the path to a parallel edge. ( SUBSET = ENS . ENS) ======= A003465Number of ways to cover an nset. FAM = COVER . ENSGiven a family of nonempty sets FAM, there are individuals covered, so they form a COVER and there are noncovered individuals, which form a set (ENS). WARNING ! The exponential generating series displayed in Encyclopedia could be divergent, having no function to represent. ======= A000110Number of partitions of a set of n labeled elements. PART = ENS ( ENS*)A partition is a set of nonempty sets. ======= A000079Number of subsets of an nset. SUBSET = ENS . ENS = LIN2 ( ENS )To give a subset means to cut into two sets, the chosen ones and the others, or to establish an oriented pair of sets. ======== A000012The simplest sequence of positive numbers: the all 1's sequence. ENSSets, the only structures having this sequence that can be defined on nsets . Also known as cardinal numbers. ========= A000142Factorial numbers a) LIN' = LIN . LIN = LIN2(LIN)Linear orders of an nset. Also known as ordinal numbers. b) PERM = ENS ( CYC )A permutation is a set of cycles. c) LIN = CYC' A linear order is a stuck cycle . Also known as cyclic numbers. === here are some books.pdf on species and EGF (SGE)=== http://web.mac.com/xgviennot/Xavier_Viennot/cours_files/Ch3.pdfhttp://algo.inria.fr/flajolet/Publications/book.pdfhttp://bergeron.math.uqam.ca/Site/bergeron_anglais_files/livre_combinatoire.pdfhttp://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~dgwagner/CO220/co220.pdf=== a personal definition of these objects === The two structures above have something in common, an abstract object, a mathematical object. First view points to the number of vertices that is the same. A second common thing occurs when one wants to label the two structures. Whatever is there, I love it.
Last edited by nick on Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:26 pm; edited 4 times in total 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:30 am  
 A0558821, 2, 8, 40, 240, 1664, 12992, 112256, 1059840, 10827264, 118758400,... ENS ( SUBSET  1 ) = PART × SUBSET sets of objects labeled with subsets or, defined simultaneously on the same set, a partition and a subset. There are twenty six labels for n = 3 [ _  a ], [ _  b ], [ _  c ], [ a  _ ], [ b  _ ], [ c  _ ], [ b  a ], [ c  b ], [ a  c ], [ a  b ], [ b  c ], [ c  a ], [ _  a, b ], [ _  b, c ], ], [ _  c, a ], [ a, b  _ ], [ b, c  _ ], [ c, a  _ ], [ c  a, b ], [ a  b, c ], ], [ b  c, a ], [ a, b  c ], [ b, c  a ], [ c, a  b ], [ _  a, b, c ], [ a, b, c  _ ] ; The subset [ _  _ ] of the empty set is not allowed ( there is link with the 1 in the formula) and every labeling contains exactly one time the symbols a, b, and c. I'd say, if a representation does not works with sets try with boxes. there are 8 labellings with labels in fourth and fifth rows, 8 labellings with labels in the first row 12 labellings with labels in the first row and second row 12 labellings with labels in the first and third row ========== A0001661, 0, 1, 2, 9, 44, 265, 1854, 14833, 133496, 1334961,... derangements, permutations with no fixed points DER . ENS = PERMA permutation has two kinds of point, the fixed ones that form a set, and the ones that loose the original position by permutation. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:36 am  
 FUNC (X, Y) = ENS ( X. ENS (Y) ) A function is a set of couples of (sets of y's and x's) ; func (x,y) = exp (x. exp(y)) SURJ (X, Y) = ENS ( X. ENS* (Y) ) A surjection is a set of couples of (nonempty sets of y's and x's) ; func (x,y) = exp (x. (exp(y)  1)) We get ENS (X) . SURJ (X, Y) = FONC (X,Y) INJ (X, Y) = ENS (X). ENS (X.Y) An injection is a couple of (x's and a set of couples of x's and y's); inj (x,y) = exp ( x + x.y ) How it works ? it is underarithmetics ! 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:55 am  
 A0073952, 2, 2, 2,... The Alternating Species ALT If one agrees that species of numbers may be seen as series of the symmetric group actions and that we may associate  the Sn acting on 1element set with cardinal numbers  the Sn acting on itself with ordinal numbers it naturally comes to ask about An, which is a normal subgroup of Sn (in addition to 1 and Sn). If we may see a set (cardinal number) as a collection of individuals in a bag, or we may see a sequence (ordinal number) as a linear order of individuals, what is the case for alternating numbers ? Take a look : In such a box we can place individuals in precise two ways modulo legal moves. Here, to take the derivative means to stick one cube. Known as "ensemble orienté" , notation E±, we have ALT' = ALT Remark: If I remove a cube, the gridbox becomes a simple bag; (and I am still working on what I obtain if I add a cube) (I am a bit confused about placing individuals in namedslots)(if the names of slots are First, Second, Third..., ordering means naming. Nevertheless, an observer whom does not know English is around, he will conclude that I am naming objects ; naming means ordering ? ). OK, one more try. Let say I have three little tomcats.  I also have three good name, Jack, Tom and Huck, and I want to name them.  The other thing I can do, is to align them from left to right. There are precise six ways to do each of above. Moreover, the actions of Sym(3) on this are transitive, since permuting tomcats I can reach all configurations of names of positions. There is only one transitive action of Sym (3) on a 6element set. Thus, naming means ordering and viceversa. So,  where vanish the Peano's rules ? how could be established something like NAMES' = NAMES.NAMES ?  It is the right time now to try my sticking technique, let's say, I will try to stick a permutation. PERM' = CYC'. PERMYes, I have to stick all the cycle my stuck individual belongs to, while the rest of individuals freely permute. Of course, if I stuck one individual in a bag, the rest of them will rest in a bag : ENS' = ENS A stuck subset is the sum of two other subsets, one when the stuck individual is inside the initial subset, one when it is outside : SUBSET' = SUBSET + SUBSET (a table would be good) and ENS*' = ENS Sticking a nonempty set, one obtains a set. PART' = ENS.PART A partition with a stuck individual is formed by the class of the stuck one and the rest of partition. Also, when sticking a proper cycle inside a permutation, one obtains a nonempty LIN and the rest of permutation: DER'.ENS = LIN.PART============== and a nice definition for a cycle, A cycle is a stickonestuckall structure (CYC' = NAMES) There is a natural way to build stickonestuckall species.  Start with a group H of order n.  represent H as a subgroup of Sym(n). It acts now transitively on its elements, and each symbol 1,a,b,c,... in H is transported exactly one time in any other symbol. If { 1, a, b, c,....} are the symbols of H, there is a unique permutation in H that transports x in y.  Consider the (n1)! classes H, sH, tH, sH....  Such a class, let's say sH, will also permute transitively { 1, a, b, c,...} because sH = n and sx( z) = sy( z) implies x = y (x, y are in H and z is a symbol in H). In fact, for each z in H, we will find in every class exactly one permutation that fixes z. This is good, because it means that each class contains one "pure” permutation of given (n1) symbols, and classes may be represented without implying one specified element of H.  Sym (n) acts transitively on classes, producing a species S.  By construction, we have Stab( H) = H. The index of H in Sym(n) is, by construction, (n1)! By disregarding one of symbols, the remaining (n1)! "pure" permutations will continue to act transitively on (n1)! Classes, delivering a nice LIN species, which satisfies S' = LIN. Abstract : To give a subgroup H of Sym(n) means also to give a species, considering the multiplication on left cosets. The trick of this construction is that the group has a large index in Sym(n), of (n1)! Greater subgroups of Sym(n) will not behave like this; they will act transitively on a smaller amount of cosets. For example, to Cayleyembed An one needs (n!/2)! symbols, that will produce the necessary amount of cosets. In conclusion, the nsubgroups of Sym(n) deliver species S that satisfy S’ = LIN(n1). Thus, groups are stickonestuckall species, integrals of LIN. Reversely, given a transitive action table with n! rows and (n1)! columns, one should be able to uniquely recover a group by taking Stab(some element). For example, the cube above IS Z2 × Z2 × Z2 as species and it has the derivative LIN7. ======= let me note another ideea, I also got the X  take an egg cup : What is the issue here ? the issue is that with these recipients of various capacities, and the individuals, and my sticking technique, and a table hehe, is the time for me to read one more time some books I like. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:53 am  
  nick wrote:
Obviously, the fourth basic operation, namely the composition is no more simple.
Could it be simple ? ======= A067994 (almost) 2, 0, 12, 0, 120, 0, 1680, .... E(X.X), labeling batteries before recycling. A123023]1, 0, 3, 0, 15, 0, 105, 0, 945, 0, 10395, 0, 135135,... E(E2), labeling fuses before recycling. ========after recycling three bateries ======= My stickonestuckall structures, integrals of LIN, seem to be more groupsactingonthemselves, or Cayleytables, than subgroups of order n in Sym(n). My question is, now, could exist a group so abstract that it does not act on something ? ================================== Here is a counterexample, E3(B), recycling three labeled batteries. B{a,b} = {B1, B2} where B1 could be {a, {b}} and B2 the other one {b, {a}}. Then E3(B){a, b, c, d, e, f} = { { B1{a,b}, B1{c,d}, B1{e,f}}, { B1{a,b}, B1{c,d}, B2{e,f}} { B2{a,b}, B2{c,d}, B2{e,f}} .... { B1{a,c}, B1{b,d}, B1{e,f}}, ...... { B2{a,f}, B1{b,e}, B1{c,d}}, } there are 8.15 = 120 E3(B) structures on my six labels a,b,c,d,e, and f. The relabeling action is transitive, since B1{x,y} may be transported in B2{x,y} by the permutation (xy) and {B1{xy}, B1{z,t}, B1{u,v}} may be transported in any other {B1, B1, B1}. The stabilizator of { B1{a,b}, B1{c,d}, B1{e,f}} contains six permutations : Stab = (), (a c e)(b d f), (a e c)(b f d), (a c) (b d), (a e)(b f), and (c e)(d f). This molecular species is revealed as the transitive action of Sym(6) on the 120 cosets of Stab. This is a counterexample, not every subgroup of index (n1)! of Sym(n) delivers a LIN by derivation. E3(B) ' = E2(B). (X+X) <> LIN5 Nevertheless, even it is isomorphic to Sym(3), Stab is here a nontransitive (two blocks) action on {a, c, e} and {b, d, f}. To deliver a LIN by derivation, a species (subgroup of Sym(n)) must be the natural (canonical) embedding of an ngroup, or the groupactingonitself, or the so called abstract group. Let me try : ABSTRACT GROUP' = ORDINAL NUMBERHow does it look ? (I am thinking at a Tshirt ) ...let me think ...let me think something like : Ag' = On... it looks too chemical... someone could believe that they have found silver in Ontario... 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:38 pm  
  nick wrote:
something like : Ag' = On ... it looks too chemical... someone could believe that they have found silver in Ontario...
So what ? It looks nice. Why should underarithmetics have to follow those scary math notations ? 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:40 am  
 Hi Doc ! you again ? Take a look here : http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/qgspring2004/octopus_toby.pdfThis fellow says :  Quote :
 (I've also drawn and counted the first 18 octopi.)
Doesn't looks to you like a case of is some incomplete induction ? Anyway : A029767Labeled octupi with n nodes. Within respect to the authors' notation, Oct = C(L_{+})========= Doc, I got something new : I have just watch a demo at the club, about stickonestuckone structures... of course, they are known in Mathematics as "Platonic Solids" Yeah, I know you want a debriefing... It was like that : after derivation, the speaker used the other hand for the stuck point; while the rest of the points remained with some liberty, following some synchronous cycles : Object' = X.(sum of some cycles(lin)). CUBE' = X. (6.CYC_{4}(X^{6}) + 8.CYC_{3}(X^{8}) + 12.CYC_{2}(X^{12})) ... labeling a cube is a mess, I got a factor 61 which comes from 6/4+8/3+12/2. I really thought that a cube is something more "spherical". My stickonestuckone species must be some SPECIES(X.X), or, structures labeled with "batteries". 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:23 pm  
  nick wrote:
 CUBE' = X. (6.CYC_{4}(X^{6}) + 8.CYC_{3}(X^{8}) + 12.CYC_{2}(X^{12}))
You Shouldn't be disappointed. I see above some d(1/4+1/3+1/2) = d + 1 + 1 where : d is the order of the cubical group, 1 stands for the onestick 1 stands for the onestuck 1/4, 1/3 and 1/2 are coefficients in some e.g.f. You should try to see what happens in four or more dimensions, even there are no more exclusively cycles there. Since you said that Ag' = Cyc', they must be equipotent. Just replace Cyc with Ag and see what happens. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:33 pm  
 Doesn't work, doc. There are no more cycles there, but cubical groups, dihedral ones and so on, and these are not abstract groups, but groups acting on something else then themselves. Sorry doc, there are no groups like abstract groups ! However, to do this requires to explain a groupaction in terms of species that are group actions for me. Before this, I'd have to explain first n! as a subgroup of n!! : A0001971, 1, 2, 720, 620448401733239439360000 a(5) has 199 digits and is too large to include. ================= The definition of a (labeled )platonic solid / could be useful ========== Ps' = X. (sum of something of LIN)  where LIN describes the solidity Ps = something(X.X) where X.X describes the stickonestuckone hypothesis ================== Before printing a Tshirt =========== Fellows, there are three kinds of groups. Type 1: The good old fashion groups of permutations  see for example the Burnside book. Type 2: The Cayley groups, subsets of G × G × G, Type 3: and the Abstract groups, stickonestuckall puzzleboxes, defined as the primitives of Lin species, for each n. Not for all, but for each. To underline the relations among these types of groups there is a huge example in Math :  take the morphisms V  >W of vectorial spaces. They are simply to describe, just formulate the element of a W base in terms of a V base.  then add a new equation, to form a particular case : V=W. Now, to describe a morphism is no more simple, but is something about Jordanisation; The example above clarifies the link between the first two types of groups : a Cayley group acts on itself, not on something else. It is like adding to the definition of an action G × M > M a new equation, G = M, to obtain a very generous particular case. Let's now take a type 3 group, a stickonestuckall puzzle box of capacity n; let us note this puzzle box with PB. By derivation, unlike the case of a linbox where I obtain n distinct other boxes, in this case I obtain only one puzzlebox, a (n1) linbox. The PB box has some liberty of relabeling (or replacement of the cubes). The important thing is that by moving a cube from the slot A to the slot B, all other slots must be deranged; since if not, by sticking a cube in one unaffected slot C, the derivate of this machine would not more be a totally stuck one, or a linbox. If you want, stickonestuckall means derangeonederangeall. Let' now introduce another remark, after taking a look at a table of a type 2 group. Well, each permutation of the initial symbols acts by derangement. In conclusion, Type 2 groups are Type 3 groups, primitives of LIN, acting by derangement. How about reversely ? Given a type 3 group,  an abstract group,  something equipotent to Cyc_{n},  subgroup of of index (n1)!, in Sym (n),  acting by deranging a nbox,,  primitive of LIN (stickonestuckall structure) could I extract some Type 2 group ? ( or, equivalently, given an action of an ngroup on an nset, knowing that is an action by derangement (excepting the 1), does this implies the action is transitive ? ) uf, seen like that is simple, YES. Take 1.A, a.A, b.A... the orbit of A. If it does not cover the whole nset, there is some repetition, s.A=t.A in the action table. This means that another permutation than the identity does not derange A, contradiction ! Deranging implies transitivity, that implies the action is equivalent to the action on itself. In conclusion, Type 3 groups are Type 2 groups as numberoidal structures. Definitivelly, Cayleygroups are primitives and the only primitives of LIN. A000001Number of groups of order n. . 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:29 am  
  nick wrote:
 numberoidal
Numberoidal ? Never heard about this, google certified. What could a numberoid be ? 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:58 am  
 Doc, there are many kinds of numbers.
The most known of them are the cardinal numbers and the ordinal numbers.
At the same level of understanding, the other kinds of numbers are numberoids.
We have:  cardinal numbers,  ordinal numbers, (these two are numbers)  15puzzles,  cycles and groups, or stickonestuckall numberoids,  platonic solids, or stickonestuckone numberoids,  rubik cubes,  trees,  and many many other types of numberoids.
The glue that stick them at the same level of understanding is a small amount of combinatorial operations. Hence the name of "Combinatorial Species".
Doc, Combinatorics infiltrated Mathematics for centuries, just take for example (a+x)^{n}, where, par Descartes, a is a constant, x is a variable, and n is an exponent.

   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:41 am  
 Well, Nick, I got a suggestion for your Tshirt :
Ag' = Cyc'
where : Ag stands for Abstract groups/ Cayley groups / s1sA puzzles etc. Cyc stands for the combinatorial species Cyc.
You got two advantages :
1) You clearly caution about the isotopes of Cyc's, and 2) You do not have to warn about LIN = NAMED. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:45 pm  
  Dr. Post wrote:
 to warn about LIN = NAMED.
Why, will you print your smock ? 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:55 pm  
 oh, nope. It just happens that I am satisfied by the dr. Kroneker's conclusion, that's all. Even it is not about numberoids, but about integers. For example, let's say you do not have the concept of 4. Then, take a mirror and look through it to a "4" digit. We see only half of a 3D space. That are mirrors good at, to take a look to the other part of our space. In the case of LIN and NAMED, we have a similar "distorsion" of perception, some kind of "temporal" distorsion. I'd say, Math is the most perfect human "imperfection". Anyway, since we are a little offtopic, I'd suggest to go back to our books and papers. I bet you are eager to write down the combinatorial definition of the hecatonicosachoron. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:50 pm  
 Then Ag' = Cyc' will be.
I also see too advantages :
 Cyc avoids all that sophisticated stuff you have just explained about Lin, On and Names;  Ag signifies that I have finally managed to understand some abstract things.
========
Doc, since these combinatorial exercises I developed some kind of "sterescopic perception". Take a look to a Cayley table that has a normal subgroup.
Does't looks to you like a clear combinatorial proof that
A normal subropup is a group of group ? 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:09 pm  
  nick wrote:
 I developed some kind of "sterescopic perception".
Mathematics of the twentieth century are based on the linear double perception. For example, in the sequence Pi(r.m) = r.m + N = r.(m +N) = r.Pi(m) the second and the third terms are "double objects". Then, you explicitly write one of them in the left side , and the other in the right side. Hence the wellknown acronyms of LHS and RHS. This happened because of the democratization of the typewriters  wikipedia wrote:
 By about 1910, the "manual" or "mechanical" typewriter had reached a somewhat standardized design.
The typewriters dramatically increased the speed of math papers writing. Definitively, your proof by taking a look at a Cayley table could be a combinatorial proof, in the best mathematical meaning. But, if someone accepts such nonlineardoubleperceptionbased proofs, it will be also forced to accept pure synthetic geometry proofs, that are also 2D or more. This could not always be the case :  wikipedia wrote:
 Dans l'enseignement secondaire en France (et aussi dans d'autres pays), la géométrie synthétique a eu tendance à être supplantée par la géométrie analytique dans les années 19601970, lors de la période dite des mathématiques modernes, avant d'effectuer un retour en tant que base de l'apprentissage du raisonnement.

   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:09 pm  
 Doc, this is another sophisticated stuff that beats me. The analytic geometry is a particular case of synthetic geometry, that requires to draw two (or more) perpendicular axes (dites cartesiennes, par Descart), to project the points of the problem on these two (or more) axes, then to solve the problem. I do not see the opposition they talk about. Let's get back to the s1sA structures, and to the s1s1 structures, and reformulate : Could describe an abstract normal subgroup defined by Ag(Ag) the numberoidal structure of a type 2 subgroup (a closed subset of a closed subset of G×G×G) ? I mean, without introducing further operations. Has the notion of a (normal) subgroup a simple "synthetic" description in bold letters ? Something like this : Abstract normal subgroup = Ah(Ag)where  Ah is an abstract Holder group,  Ag is an abstract group. Of course, if Ah and Ag are simple groups, we have Ah(Ag) = Ag(Ah). 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:21 pm  
 A000522 (nice small index !) 1, 2, 5, 16, 65, 326, 1957, ... (Gosh, all those guys never heard about Sokoban ! Sokoban' = Sokoban + Lin.SokobanBy sticking a cube in a Sokoban puzzle, Either I do not disconnect the box, obtaining a new Sokoban puzzle, Or I disconnect the box : In the area without pusher all cubes are stuck while the pusher's area is a new Sokoban. 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:39 am  
  nick wrote:
 Then Ag' = Cyc' will be.
Hey Nick, I hope that you did'n print your Tshirt yet, since I got another suggestion. Ag' = NAg meaning Abstract Groups, or stick1stuckAll structures. ' means to stick one cube N stands for Named Numbers (ordinal numbers). Then :  you avoid the chemistry department, to not produce confusion;  I will thing about one very important aspect: What is that thing that allows:  the construction of Lin over Named  that allows to separate the combinatorial structure Cyc among the numberoidals Ag. I see two advantages :  the formula will engage only your reformulated terms/personal understanding  it could be possible to isolate that special glue that links a combinatorial species(N+1) to the same combinatorial species(N), by comparing Ag' = N to Cyc' = Linfor example Z5 is linked to Z4 and not to Z2×Z2. Even you take the field Z5, its multiplicative group is [/b]Z4. Once isolated the glue, this will allow us to talk about numberoidal structures when the context will require. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:04 am  
 Doc, how about:
Ng' = N
where  Ng means Nick's personal understood groups, or Numberoidal groups,  ' means Nick' personal understood derivation by sticking  N stands for the ordinal numbers First, Second, Third,... read by a nonenglish speaker.
Thus :  my Tshirt becomes a quite personalized Tshirt,  I correctly avoid the G notation, that beats me,  no chemical confusions  and, also, it suggests that by derivation we got a tremendous loss of information ! 
   G funk Pythagoras
Posts : 19 Join date : 20101029
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:06 pm  
  nick wrote:
  I correctly avoid the G notation, that beats me,!
Whooa ! Bro, this fellow has a problem with the Gword, ain't you think ? 
   G funk Pythagoras
Posts : 19 Join date : 20101029
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:32 pm  
 Bro, this fellow is quite confused. He does not know the difference between a definition and a proof.  nick wrote:
 Does't looks to you like a clear combinatorial proof that
A normal subropup is a group of group ? normal_sougroup is a word that occures only once, hence it must be a defined term, not a proofed one. Nevertheles, since the Gword has no other combinatorial definition, it definitively stands for GROUP. 
   G funk Pythagoras
Posts : 19 Join date : 20101029
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:52 pm  
 Yeah, G' = N looks better.
Nick, print your Tshirt G' = N. 
   nick Euclid
Posts : 95 Join date : 20090915 Age : 55 Location : Alexandria
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:07 am  
 How about a college level proof that one cannot interchange two cubes in the 15puzzle, other than my verification. Par Rubik, I know how to cycle every three of them ! The Wikipedia's Parity_of_a_permutation#Proof_1looks more like a proof by postulation; they postulate that the identity is an even permutation. Ok. How can I proof the amount of nice puzzles equals the amount of impossibles ones, without postulating that identity is an even permutation ?. ???? Par Rubik ! ( a b x ) ( a b y ) ( a b z ) ( a b x) (a b y) = ( x z y )This means that I can do all the stuff above using tricycles that pass by two flagged points, a and b ! I have also ( a b x ) ( b a y ) ( a b x ) = (a b) (x y)This is a good news, because if one mess my 15puzzle by transposing cubes two at a time, and he makes an even number of transpositions, then, at each couple of steps, either it makes an XX that I recover with the second formula, or it makes a tricycle that I recover with the first formula. As I intuited, the "impossible" puzzles are at a distance of one transposition of the "solvable" ones. Anyway, one do not need to make the additional transposition (x y) since I know how to recover it by paying an ( a b ). My "solvable: puzzles are at a distance (a b) of the "impossible" ones. Since the length of a chain of transposition either is odd either is even, my puzzles are either "solvable", or at a distance of ( a b ) to a solvable one. This shows that the number of "solvable" ones equals the number of "impossibles". It remains to show that the "impossibles" exist  being really impossibles, and  consequently  that my "solvable" puzzles are the only ones solvable. Doc, how about this ? Look at the Wiki proofs by postulation :  Wiki EN 1 considers that I cannot obtain the identity by the mean of odd permutations,  Wiki EN 2 involves some rational polynomials, defined as 1 for identity that is a proof "by definition",  Wiki FR claims that the parity of identity is even : since that huge formula is not defined on identity. then N(0), the signature of identity, must be 1, not 1 or { 1, 1}. I still have to show, without postulating, that there are unreachable configurations in the puzzles larger than 4×4. 
   Dr. Post Pythagoras
Posts : 23 Join date : 20101023
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:35 pm  
 I do not see a solution, Nick.
I think you should postulate :
There are, for each n, alternating puzzles that you cannot solve.
This would imply, as consequences :
 The Altern Species exists,  Your solubles are the even permutations for each n, and since identity is soluble, it must be even for each n,  The number of solubles are n!/2 = to the number of impossibles,  The discriminant / signature function has indeed the value 1 on identity and it is well defined.

   Sponsored content
 Subject: Re: Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences  
 
    Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences  

 Permissions in this forum:  You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 
 
 